The First Known Photograph of the Loch Ness Monster

first-loch-ness-monster-photo-taken-nov-12-1933

A Brief History

On November 12, 1933, Hugh Gray took the first known photos of the Loch Ness Monster.

Digging Deeper

Outside of maybe Bigfoot, Nessie (the Loch Ness Monster) is probably the most well-known cryptid in the English-speaking world.  Claims of the existence of this monster date back possibly as far back as to Saint Columba (December 7, 521 – June 9,  597).  According to legend, Columba helped rescue a man from a water beast in Scotland.

Of course, humans had not yet invented photographs and so it would not be for another nearly millennium and a half until “evidence” of the monster outside of eye-witness accounts would come about.

To that end, Hugh Gray would achieve his place among the world’s most famous photographers of cryptids for his “encounter” on November 12, 1933.  After attending church, he walked along Loch Ness, eventually noticing something strange happening in the water.  He claims that a massive creature then emerged, prompting him to take pictures, only one of which actually showed “something” upon being developed.  The famous photograph shows what appears to be an elongated creature surfacing, possibly splashing about, thereby blurring the image, with possible flippers also identifiable.  On the right side of the photograph, perhaps you can see what might be a head versus a tail on the left side.

Or maybe it just shows a dog carrying a stick in its mouth making its way in the water toward the cameraman.

For better or worse, we have no definitive explanation of what is actually in that photograph, but it was only the beginning.  Throughout the 1930s and even in the present decade, more photographs and videos would emerge purportedly depicting the so-called “monster”.  During the past 80 years, others would search for Nessie using everything from sonar to submersibles and yet no irrefutable proof has yet materialized.

Yet, we ask our readers, what do you think?  Is the photograph of Hugh Gray depicting some kind of “monster”, a dog with a stick, or something else altogether?  Please let us know in the comments below!

Historical Evidence

While many books and documentaries have been written about the subject covered in today’s article, a good starting place is the following  book:



List Price: $19.95 USD
New From: $15.70 USD In Stock
Used from: $5.00 USD In Stock

Matthew Zarzeczny

Matthew graduated with a B.A. in French and history from Baldwin-Wallace College. At BW, Matthew minored in political science. He earned a Master’s in History at Kent State University and a Ph.D. in History from the Ohio State University. He teaches history at Ashland University, John Carroll University, and Kent State University at Stark.

  • Peter Queen

    Awesome piece Mathew! Although I am a bit of a sceptic when it comes to cryptids I wouldn’t mind waking up one day with headlines stating that proof has been found.

  • Mohd Ariff Mohd Rasidi

    Did anyone notice a face (specifically a right eye and teeth) on the linked picture? I can’t visualise a dog carrying a stick though, dammit.

    • Jaime Dodds

      Look at the original picture, not the one with the tracing on it. Totally looks like a dog carrying a stick, swimming through the water straight toward the camera. The curved line going left to right looks like the stick, and it looks like what could be a yellow lab’s face. THe face is a lot lighter and more blurry than the stick. :)

      • Mohd Ariff Mohd Rasidi

        Ahh, I see it now. Thanks for pointing it out.

        • Jaime Dodds

          Sure! The one at the top of the page you can’t see anything with the drawing overtop, so when you go to the original, at first I was looking for the dog in the same direction as the drawing is done. Took me a second. :)